- Force Multipliers
- Posts
- Breaking up with High-Performing Jerks
Breaking up with High-Performing Jerks
Navigating departures of "brilliant jerks" or people who've outgrown the company with integrity and clarity
Hi! Welcome to another issue of Force Multipliers, your weekly briefing from Regina Gerbeaux, where Silicon Valley's behind-the-scenes operators get battle-tested frameworks for their toughest challenges, from putting out chaotic fires to managing strong personalities.
Every leader I know has been here at least once: You have someone on your team who is undeniably brilliant at their job.
But… they're also kind of a nightmare to work with.
Maybe they deliver results that are 10x better than anyone else on the team, but they're condescending in meetings. Or they're the only person who understands your core algorithm, but they throw tantrums when they don't get their way. Perhaps they built the foundation of your product, but now they're emotionally blackmailing you because they know how hard they'd be to replace.
I call these people "brilliant jerks," and they create one of the most difficult leadership dilemmas you'll face as a CEO.
Do you keep them at the risk of killing the morale of everyone else around you? Or do you let them go, but risk moving even slower because they are no longer lending their talents and skills to your org?
What do you do when someone's professional value comes at the cost of everyone else's wellbeing?
Today's issue is dedicated to helping you navigate these situations with both business sense and human decency.

The Brilliant Jerk Dilemma
Let me tell you about a situation I helped a CEO work through last year.
This founder had a lead engineer who was, by all accounts, exceptional at his job. He'd built most of their core infrastructure, understood their system better than anyone, and could solve complex technical problems in hours that would take other engineers days.
But he was also a complete ass to work with.
He'd interrupt people in meetings, dismiss ideas without consideration, and had zero patience for anyone he deemed "less technical." The rest of the engineering team walked on eggshells around him. Two good engineers had already quit, citing his behavior as a primary reason.
Several people told the CEO to let him go. Some real things I heard them say:
He’s a pain in the ass to work with
He thinks he’s better than everyone else
He gets angry so easily
He thinks you’re an idiot if you don’t agree with him
He isn’t a team player and makes collaboration impossible
The CEO kept making excuses: "He's just passionate about the work." "He doesn't mean to be rude." "We can't afford to lose him right now."
Sound familiar?
Eventually though, there came a breaking point.
It came when this engineer started threatening to quit every time he didn't get his way on technical decisions.
That's when the CEO realized they weren't managing a brilliant contributor - they were being held hostage by someone who knew exactly how hard they'd be to replace.
The Playbook: How to Handle Brilliant Jerks
Here’s what you can do if you find yourself in the presence of a brilliant jerk.
Step 1: Decide if you should hire them in the first place.
The best time to deal with a brilliant jerk is before they become your problem.
In most cases, don't hire them. Even if they're exceptionally talented, brilliant jerks poison company culture and demotivate everyone else around them. Most roles simply aren't mission-critical to the point where it's worth the cultural damage.
The only exception: When their expertise is genuinely irreplaceable and the role can be isolated.
For example, if there are only ten algorithm engineers in the world who can do what you need, and you can structure the role so they primarily interact with one person (usually the CEO), then maybe it's worth considering.
💡Pro tip: Use contract-to-hire for all roles, especially specialized ones. This gives both you and the candidate a chance to test the relationship before making permanent commitments. They get to evaluate whether they want to be there, and you get to see if they're actually the best person for the job.
Step 2: When you do hire a brilliant jerk, contain the damage.
If you've already hired someone like this, or inherited them, here's how to minimize the cultural impact:
Isolate them from the rest of the team. Structure their role so they primarily interact with one person who has a higher tolerance for their behavior and understands their value.
Set crystal-clear expectations. Make it mentally clear to yourself that this is purely a work relationship. You're unlikely to have much more than that with this person, and that's okay.
Define concrete goals and deliverables. The main reason you're keeping them is because they deliver exceptional results. Make sure they're actually delivering. If they're not performing at the level that justifies their behavior, they're not a brilliant jerk - they're just a jerk.
Step 3: Know when to let them go.
This is where most CEOs struggle. Here are the clear signals that it's time for a brilliant jerk to go:
When the cons outweigh the pros. If their behavior is causing more damage than their contributions create value, the math is simple.
When they have to manage people. If the role evolution requires them to lead a team and they can't or won't improve their interpersonal skills, they've outgrown their usefulness.
When their work is no longer specialized. Once they've built the "secret sauce" and other people can maintain or build on their work, their irreplaceability diminishes.
When their behavior threatens company stability. Erratic behavior, emotional blackmail, or threats to quit every time they don't get their way all cross the line into potentially damaging the company.
The Keeper Test: Ask yourself this question from the playbook written by Reed Hastings, CEO of Netflix: If they were offered another job tomorrow and decided to take it, how hard would I fight to keep them at the company? If the answer isn't "very hard," you have your answer.
Step 4: Let them go with integrity.
When you do decide to part ways, how you handle the departure matters enormously. Your team will be watching closely to see how you treat former employees.
Put yourself in their shoes. Getting fired is devastating emotionally and financially, regardless of the circumstances that led to it.
Provide real support for their transition:
Give them a meaningful severance package (minimum two months, realistically three or more)
Put genuine effort into helping them find their next role quickly
Become their advocate in your network
Handle the announcement with class. Don't blame or criticize them publicly. Instead, praise their contributions to the company and take ownership for the mismatch. Either you didn't evaluate well during recruiting, or you didn't onboard effectively. Take responsibility and explain what you're doing differently going forward.
Help them find their ideal role. This person has skills and passions that didn't align with your company's needs. Help them figure out what their dream job would be, then become their agent. Write a description of their talents, post it on your social media with your endorsement, and actively connect them with opportunities.
💡Pro tip: If you find yourself in this position, check out my write-up on letting people go. This resource from the Mochary Method curriculum is also helpful on firing well.
Case Study: How Tim Cook Handled Apple's Most Famous Brilliant Jerk
Want to see this playbook in action? Let's look at how Tim Cook dealt with Scott Forstall - one of the most high-profile brilliant jerk departures in tech history.
Scott Forstall joined Apple in 1992 and rose to Senior Vice President of iOS by 2003. He was widely credited with shepherding the Aqua interface, Safari browser, and the original iPhone OS - innovations that literally reshaped Apple's product line.
But insiders consistently described him as fiercely territorial, prone to cutting off collaborators, and quick to dismiss ideas he didn't originate.
How his "brilliance" became toxic:
Forstall's behavior created serious problems across Apple's leadership team. He clashed so badly with Jony Ive (design) and Bob Mansfield (technology) that meetings between them required Tim Cook to personally mediate the conversations.
The breaking point came with the iOS 6 Maps debacle in September 2012. When Apple's built-in Maps app launched riddled with errors - missing landmarks, misrouted directions, even inverted coastlines - the company faced rare public criticism.
Under Apple's "directly responsible individual" principle, Forstall was expected to sign the company's public apology. He refused. That defiance became the final straw.
Tim Cook's response:
Just over a month after Maps launched, Cook announced that Forstall would leave Apple and serve as Cook's advisor through the end of the year, and his core responsibilities were redistributed across the team.
Cook's decision sent a crystal-clear message: no individual's technical prowess outweighs the need for collaboration and accountability.
The results:
Short-term, reassigning Forstall's duties immediately smoothed cross-departmental workflows. Design and engineering began integrating more tightly without the territorial battles.
Long-term, Apple launched iOS 7 in 2013 with a completely revamped, collaboratively designed interface. The company has maintained its reputation for seamless hardware-software integration ever since.
Tim Cook's handling of Scott Forstall shows that even star performers must be held to the same behavioral standards as everyone else when their conduct undermines the broader team. This enforced accountability helped Apple realign around its core values of design unity and operational discipline.
Conclusion
Here's what I've learned from helping dozens of CEOs through these situations: keeping a brilliant jerk is almost never worth it in the long run.
Yes, they might be exceptionally talented. Yes, replacing them might be difficult and expensive. But the hidden costs - team morale, cultural erosion, and the good people who leave because of them - usually far exceed their individual contributions.
The companies that build lasting success are the ones that prioritize both performance and culture. They understand that how you achieve results matters as much as the results themselves.
So if you're currently dealing with a brilliant jerk, ask yourself this: What kind of company do you want to build? One where exceptional work justifies toxic behavior, or one where exceptional people treat each other with respect?
The choice you make will define your culture more than any mission statement ever could.
Until next time,

And if you’re reading this - you're already ahead.
Because you know where to find the stuff that’s actually good. Like my templates and resources, and this newsletter.
Resources Mentioned 📌
Templates + Tools for Operators | Coaching Founder
Written Resources & Playbooks | Coaching Founder
6 Mistakes to Avoid When Firing Someone | Coaching Founder
Firing Well | Mochary Method Curriculum
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Are you here for the first time? If so, remember to subscribe below…
Want more operational content?
Check out Coaching Founder for over a dozen free, downloadable Notion templates to use at your company, and tons of write-ups on how to level up your execs, your teams, and yourself.
About Regina Gerbeaux
![]() | Regina Gerbeaux was the first Chief of Staff to an executive coach who worked with Silicon Valley’s most successful entrepreneurs, including Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), Naval Ravikant (AngelList), Sam Altman (OpenAI / Y Combinator), and Alexandr Wang (Scale). |
Shortly after her role as Chief of Staff, then COO, she opened her own coaching practice, Coaching Founder, and has worked with outrageously talented operators on teams like Delphi AI, dYdX, Astronomer, Fanatics Live, and many more companies backed by funds like Sequoia and Andreessen Horowitz.
Her open-sourced write-ups on Operational Excellence and how to run a scaling company can be found here and her templates can be found here.
She lives in the Pacific Northwest with her partner Lucas and dog Leia, and can be found frequenting 6:00AM Orangetheory classes or hiking trails nearby.
Reply