Ops Leaders and EAs: The real superhero team

How ops leaders and executive assistants can best collaborate to become true Force Multipliers

Hi! Welcome to another issue of Force Multipliers, your weekly briefing from Regina Gerbeaux, where Silicon Valley’s behind-the-scenes operators get battle-tested frameworks for their toughest challenges, from putting out chaotic fires to managing strong personalities.

💡 Note: For the sake of today’s post in order to reduce wordiness, I will refer to Ops Leaders as “Chiefs of Staff” since the original person asking the question was a Chief of Staff. Even if you are NOT a Chief of Staff by title, you can sub out “Chief of Staff” for any other Ops Leader title. The Playbook reads the same.)

Today’s topic is one that I absolutely adore: the relationship between a Chief of Staff and an Executive Assistant.

Every high-performing executive I know has a Chief of Staff and an Executive Assistant. But often, a major question comes up: How does division of responsibility actually work?Isn’t it redundant having two ops people that work so closely with a single exec? Is this a misallocation of resources?

I’m excited to dive in today and explain why not only is this a common fallacy, but explain how to leverage the CoS-EA relationship to be a true Force Multiplying relationship in a company. Let’s go.

Dear Regina,

I work as a Chief of Staff and know pretty clearly how I can act as a Force Multiplier to my CEO. But my CEO also has an executive assistant, Kelly, who knows my CEO more deeply than I do, and has had longer tenure with the company.

I want to know how I can best work with Kelly for the two of us to be even stronger Force Multipliers for our CEO - he needs the both of us for sure! But how do I know how my role should work with hers, to manage him and also the company as a whole?

I would love to know what good delegation and division of responsibilities look like, and how we can divide and conquer where appropriate (or team up where appropriate!)

(Chief of Staff, Series C, 75 people, $50M raised)

Dear Operator,

Let me address one of the most common fallacies I see in the ops world: the misconception about the importance of a Chief of Staff’s work compared to an Executive Assistant.

Many people mistakenly believe that a Chief of Staff's work is inherently more important or strategic than that of an Executive Assistant. This couldn't be further from the truth. Both roles are absolutely critical components of creating operational success in an organization.

Think of it this way: would you say your heart is more important than your lungs? Your brain more critical than your spine?

Much like a body couldn't function without all of its core organs working in harmony, a company cannot reach its full potential without both Chiefs of Staff AND Executive Assistants operating at their best.

The confusion often starts when there is a misunderstanding of the difference between these roles. While there may be some overlap in responsibilities (which we'll discuss shortly), these roles are distinctly different and complementary rather than redundant. Rather than viewing the Chief of Staff and Executive Assistant roles hierarchically, I want to encourage you to think about your roles as affecting different spheres of influence and expertise. And when you combine these effectively, you both create an unstoppable, powerful operational force.

Here’s the playbook on working together.

The Playbook on the Chief of Staff and Executive Assistant Relationship

Prerequisite: Swear confidentiality. 💡 

Let me start by saying this: in general, your exec should NOT be a part of any of these calls between the Chief of Staff and EA! If your exec is present, both of you will likely withhold valuable and vulnerable information you should ideally share with each other.

In fact, in the very beginning, the Chief of Staff and Executive Assistant should swear absolute secrecy for all contents they discuss with each other. Stories of vulnerability and of the exec should remain strictly between the two of them, never to be heard by the Exec themself or anyone else on the team.

Neither party should go to the Exec and say, “Did you know that ____ said this about you?” If this behavior happens, the Exec should take appropriate actions to punish the disclosing party for violating confidentiality - not the person who voiced the story.

Ideally, your fellow Operator will become someone in the trenches with you whom you feel total trust confiding in. Operational roles can be lonely! Use this as your opportunity to build camaraderie with someone else who gets it, firsthand.

What if I think the other Operator has bad intentions?

The only time this rule can be overruled is if either the Chief of Staff or the EA believe the other person does not have the Exec’s best interest at heart, and is maliciously acting to sabotage the Exec and the company.

Even then, the person informing the Exec should NEVER disclose the contents of what was said to them - as that would still be a violation of confidentiality. Instead, the operator should surface that there may be alignment issues, and continue monitoring the situation. You could say something like this:

“I’ve noticed some potential misalignment issues with [offending party] and feel concerned that decisions aren’t being made in the company’s best interest.” Then, include examples that you can point to of malicious behavior or weaponized incompetence.)

By sharing it in this manner, you avoid this devolving into he-said she-said hearsay.

Step One: Build Mutual Respect 💡 

A prerequisite to working well together is that the Chief of Staff and Executive Assistant must absolutely respect each other. There can be no effective collaboration if either party thinks they are more important than the other.

Two common pitfalls I’ve seen in the Chief of Staff/Executive Assistant dynamic:

  • Executive Assistants may become resentful of Chiefs of Staff that get hired for seemingly more complex projects.

    • The fear narrative usually playing through the EA’s mind sounds something like this: "I've been with my exec for years, and now this Chief of Staff comes in with more responsibilities and automatically inherits trust that I've worked towards for years! What does this person know? They don't know the exec nearly as well as I do."

    • When the EA thinks this, it translates into their actions. Here is what the Chief of Staff reactively thinks: "This Executive Assistant is defensive. They don't like me and they're afraid I'm going to take away their job. I cannot work with this person, because they have a massive ego and think they run things around here!"

  • Chiefs of Staff may treat Executive Assistants with contempt or behave condescendingly if they’re not careful.

    • The narrative based on contempt usually sounds something like this: “I’m a Chief of Staff, so my exec trusts no one more than they trust me. This executive assistant can be helpful, but only with a limited scope and to a limited extent. Otherwise, why are they ‘just’ an EA? They must be an EA because they don’t have what it takes to be a Chief of Staff. I’d better do the operational heavy lifting.”

    • When the Chief of Staff thinks this, it too translates into their actions. Here is what the Executive Assistant reactively thinks: “This Chief of Staff is arrogant! They think I’m dumb and less capable of an operator than them. I cannot work with this person and their huge ego, because they think they’re better than me for [insert a multitude of reasons, including but not limited to: going to the right university, getting the right degree, being older/more senior/younger/more nimble, etc. - yes, reader…I’ve heard a combo of all of these!]”

Operator - please do NOT fall for any of these narratives. They are based in fear and contempt, which are governed by our amygdalae. You do not want this part of your brain to control your actions - and to combat it, you must actively fight these narratives.

To build mutual respect:

  • Get to know each other 1-1 beyond our roles and responsibilities at your current company.

  • Here are some questions you can ask each other to build authentic connection:

    • How do you think your work experience thus far has informed the kind of operator you are? Don't tell me only the success stories, but tell me about the times where you felt like you were going to die, or where things were an absolute shit show.

    • Who are the most important people in your life? Why do they matter to you?

    • If I really knew you, what would I know about you? What is something you don't usually want people to know? (CoS should share first and share one of their deepest professional fears. This disarms the EA's potential fear narrative that the CoS has a huge ego and is a know-it-all. EAs should share after, and they should also share a vulnerable story about how they got to the role they're in today. This helps disarm the CoS's potential contempt narrative that the EA is dumb or lazy or unambitious.)

    • What is something you're passionate about outside of work? Why does that light you up?

  • Make each other feel heard and thank each other each time after they share something vulnerable with you.

If you share vulnerably in this manner, you are having a courageous conversation. Courage takes vulnerability, and it's very difficult to hate or distain someone who discloses information that takes courage to share.

Once you've established this foundation of mutual respect and understanding, you can move on to discussing how to best divide and conquer your responsibilities.

Step Two: Understand your exec’s delineation of responsibilities between both of you. 💡 

Sometimes, people think there is work that falls under “CoS” work versus “EA” work. While there are themes, there is no one-size-fits-all, as your responsibilities will depend on:

  1. What your company needs

  2. What your exec’s strengths and weaknesses are

  3. What each of your Zones of Genius are

  4. How much support each operator has

Here are the two most common groupings I observe between a Chief of Staff’s responsibilities, versus those of an EA’s:

Chief of Staff

  • Often works on 0 → 1 strategic initiatives and special projects as requested by their Exec

  • These projects are usually not fully baked out yet and therefore complicated, requiring info on what the exec is thinking from the business perspective and why those projects matter

  • The end-DRI responsible for getting V1 of the project or initiative rolling, while orchestrating the resourcing provided (in time and personnel)

  • Often times, a CoS will do these priorities and the ones mentioned in the EA column, until there is so much work to do that they must bring on an EA to help them with dividing and conquering the sheer load of work to get done.

Executive Assistant

  • Often is the DRI for unblocking the exec in many nitty-gritty ways, such as making sure the Exec has enough time to make important meetings, take breaks, get deep work done, and complete basic human functions like eating and sleeping

  • Usually involved on the more interpersonal side of things. Many Execs struggle with interpersonal relationships - they usually miss the “small things.” Many EAs have the superpower of knowing how to make their exec likable: drafting notes of encouragement, sending congratulatory or condolence gifs, and in general sweating so many small details that make the difference between whether a client/person’s experience is merely good or exceptional.

Your collective action:

Each of you should write a list ahead of time of your perceived responsibilities. Then, during your next meeting, compare the lists. Where is there significant overlap? Which roles do you enjoy doing, and which ones do you not enjoy doing or feel less competent at?

Step Three: Discuss your exec’s biggest strengths and weaknesses. 💡 

Now that you’ve laid out what each of you believe you’re responsible for, talk about what you each think your Exec’s Zones of Genius are… and what their Zones of Incompetence are.

This should be a really fun part of the conversation to have, as both of you likely have similar observations. This is a time to share laughs and exchange stories.

This is not meant to be treated as gossip: this is a time for you to exchange valuable information with another Operator, so you can better understand your exec (and each other.)

Remember the strict confidentiality you swore as a prerequisite? This is one of the many reasons why. The more candidly you can speak off the books, the more likely you will enjoy this part of the conversation (and the more you will connect with the other operator.)

With each zone:

  • For Zones of Genius, brainstorm: how can we amplify this?

  • For Zones of Excellence, brainstorm: how can we delegate this so it doesn’t suck away time from Exec’s Zones of Genius?

  • For Zones of Competence and Incompetence, brainstorm: how can you and I divide and conquer so we minimize and/or handle this altogether for our Exec?

Compile a list of action items to do, and present it to your Exec. Share:

“____ and I came up with this list together on where we believe your time is best spent. Here is our plan on getting you to focus on spending majority of your time doing the things you love, and we’ll handle the rest. What do you think?”

Your Exec will think two things:

  1. They trust the two of you more, because you have demonstrated teamwork and collaboration.

  2. They feel relief, because you are allowing them to do the work that really matters in the long run.

Step Four: Tag-team on your respective Zones of Genius. 💡 

Okay, you’ve sworn secrecy, established mutual respect, figured out each person’s delineation of responsibilities, and exchanged stories of your Exec’s strengths and weaknesses.

To be a true Force Multiplier, it’s time to tag-team in your respective Zones of Genius. Let me explain:

Even though both of you wear the Operator title, one of you might be good at sweating the small stuff while the other is great at orchestrating.

One of you might know the Exec a little more personally, while the other knows the Exec more professionally.

Divvy up your work accordingly! Who is best at doing what? Who loves doing what? And for anything you both can collaborate on: understand each others’ working styles.

If you’re an EA, do you do best when there are clear orders of priority given by the Chief of Staff?

If you’re a Chief of Staff, do you need the EA to unblock the Exec’s calendar for him or her so that he or she can help align the Exec on mission-critical priorities?

The biggest focus: Work together.

There is a proverb that I love: “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.”

You and your fellow Operator were brought onto the team for a reason, and if you like your Exec and respect them, you likely respect their judgment call, too. You each have something valuable and important to offer to your Exec and the company.

Cultivate a feeling of gratitude and focus on abundance, rather than embracing a zero-sum mindset where there is only room for one operator at the company. I seriously recommend keeping an ongoing list of all the things you appreciate about the other Operator…and then sharing it with them.

I think there is nowhere where “going far together” is more true than the Chief of Staff and Executive Assistant relationship. You can only be a true Force Multiplier if you intimately understand how best to work with your operational counterpart. Imagine how much more powerful the two of you will be - together.

Until next time,

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Are you here for the first time? If so, remember to subscribe below…

Want more operational content?

Check out Coaching Founder for over a dozen free, downloadable Notion templates to use at your company, and tons of write-ups on how to level up your execs, your teams, and yourself.

About Regina Gerbeaux

Regina Gerbeaux was the first Chief of Staff to an executive coach who worked with Silicon Valley’s most successful entrepreneurs, including Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), Naval Ravikant (AngelList), Sam Altman (OpenAI / Y Combinator), and Alexandr Wang (Scale).

Shortly after her role as Chief of Staff, then COO, she opened her own coaching practice, Coaching Founder, and has worked with outrageously talented operators on teams like Delphi AI, dYdX, Astronomer, Fanatics Live, and many more companies backed by funds like Sequoia and Andreessen Horowitz.

Her open-sourced write-ups on Operational Excellence and how to run a scaling company can be found here and her templates can be found here.

She lives in the Pacific Northwest with her partner Lucas and dog Leia, and can be found frequenting 6:00AM Orangetheory classes or hiking trails nearby.

Reply

or to participate.